|
Post by c0d3monk33 on Nov 24, 2006 15:01:40 GMT 12
Ok, so does anybody play DBA / DBM or Warhammer Ancients on here?
Any opinion about the relative merits of each?
Phil? You're an Ancients man aincha? As opposed to an ancient man?
|
|
|
Post by PitYak Studios on Nov 25, 2006 8:15:44 GMT 12
both.
What little I know about the two, I think they are quite different, with warhammer being close to the regular warhammer, 1:1, individual figure stats and such like, while dbm is played using "elements" - stands of figures. From what I've read these stands are always the same size (or maybe just same frontage?) or always have the same effective strength or something like that. I've been meaning to give it a go, as all my ancients are currently based on the same size stands, but the rules I was using with them are just a bit too technical and slow
|
|
|
Post by c0d3monk33 on Nov 27, 2006 10:36:05 GMT 12
Yes, through the miracle of electronic equines I have managed to secure both rule sets.
WHA is just WH 5th Ed with different armies and no magic. So has the usual focus on requiring hordes of figures and uses the same crude 'Leadership' stat that everything else in the GW stable.
DBA/DBM sounds like it could be a lot more interesting to play and as you say is elements based which makes more sense to me. Their command scheme sounds quite interesting too. The rules are quite dense and difficult to read however!
Really I just want to buy some excellent looking Corvus Belli 15mm ancient Romans and Carthaginians so I can paint them up.
|
|
|
Post by c0d3monk33 on Nov 27, 2006 13:28:55 GMT 12
That also reminds me: do you own any 15mm ancients? If so which manufacturer?
|
|
|
Post by PitYak Studios on Nov 28, 2006 7:31:08 GMT 12
I don't have any 15mm ancients, all mine are 20mm plastics. Where did you get the rules?
|
|
|
Post by c0d3monk33 on Nov 28, 2006 9:08:25 GMT 12
Ah ok, I'll let you know how the 15mm metals turn out if and when I secure any! 20mm plastics sounds interesting too. Any local suppliers? Where did I get the rules? Enough said.
|
|
|
Post by c0d3monk33 on Nov 30, 2006 15:06:14 GMT 12
|
|
|
Post by PitYak Studios on Nov 30, 2006 19:44:16 GMT 12
Italeri are about the best, and esci if if you can find them, but they are out of production. I also have a few Hat, which are very, very changeable; some barely passable, some downright awful, but with a bit of clever paintwork they don't turn out too bad. Sadly, Hat have got an absolutely mind blowing range, they cover everything, and unlike other mfrs don't include command figures, you buy them seperately. This means you don't end up with dozens of extra officers like you do with other ranges. but generally, the figures suck. If italeri would do the range of Hat's figures I'd be in little plastic man heaven. Revell are also changeable, as their range is a mix of original figs and remolds of other mfrs, so you never quite know what you are getting. Also strelets, caesar and orion from eastern europe are worth a look; caesar are excellent figs with an interesting range, strelets again a good range but the figures are a bit chunky, look sort of like metal figs, but don't tend to go well with other mfrs'. orion a good range too, and figs are pretty good. "interestingly", orion and strelets are sculpted actual size, rather than pantographed down (and it shows) plasticsoldierreview.com is the place to look if you are interested. For most historicals 20mm plastics are my first choice; good compromise between small enough to have billions of figs, and big enough to a good job with. and somewhere out there you can find practically any figure you want. so in summary, itaeri = best figs, HaT = best range, orion = reasonable figs, obscure-can't-get-anywhere-else range, strelets = chunky figs, good range too. caesar = excellent figs, limited range (looking back over that, I'm getting myself confused - I can never remember which ones are orion and which caesar, but hey, i've got thousands of the blighters)
|
|
|
Post by c0d3monk33 on Dec 13, 2006 8:27:50 GMT 12
Well in the end I went with Corvus Belli 15mm metals. Ordered Romans and Carthaginian army from Olypmian Games in Aussie and they arrived yesterday. They're pretty damn sweet little figures I have to say and very 'true 15mm' rather than the FOW rather heroic 15mm scale. Now I just have to clean them all up, base them all up and start researching suitable colours for Carthaginian ancients... My Romans are a mix of segmentum and mail armor too...although apparently the segmentum wasn't used until around 20BC...and Carthage was razed by the Romans in 146BC. Nuts! Ah well, segmentum is more interesting to paint than mail anyway . Historic wargaming is a great way to learn about stuff too...amazing how destructive Rome was for the contemporary civilisations around them.
|
|
|
Post by PitYak Studios on Dec 13, 2006 9:38:24 GMT 12
and not so too - their neighbours only got destroyed if they wouldn'r buckle under. If they did bow down, they were granted almost equal rights, and their original leaders would become equals with other roman leaders. This is how later roman armies ended up with auxilliria from all over the known world. In fact, the very late roman army bore almost no resemblance to the classic view of the legionaries, with heavy troops in mail surcoats, and a large contigent of missile and melee cavalry, such as the super heavy cataphracts; fully armoured, armoured horses, and carrying two handed lances called kontos. These types of troops were initally eastern goths I think.
This policy of absorbing cultures was partly responsible for the split in the british tribes when the romans invaded; some of the british chieftans looked over to their counterparts in europe who had signed up, saw the good life they now had and decided they wanted a piece of it. My dark ages arthurians are essentially late romans, with a few mid period romans thrown in, since I hadn't done a lot of research when I started collecting them.
HaT are the only mfr I know of who do 20mm cataphracts, and at least that is one of their better sets so I'm tempted to get some. But first I need to finish my tommies, DAK, confederates, cyberpunks, steampunks, lizards from outer space...
|
|
|
Post by c0d3monk33 on Dec 13, 2006 10:57:05 GMT 12
Interesting times to live in I'll wager...
I'm really looking forward to painting up these figures, since there's only a handful to do for each base. Do you know of any good resources for Early Roman / Late Carthaginian uniform/equipment colour etc?
Must resist the urge to assemble and paint the Elephant first though...I think I'll keep him as a special treat for the end. That should hopefully motivate me!
DBA looks like an interesting rule set too. Certainly a few of the finer points are lost on me at the moment (having only read the rules rather than played them yet) but the 'pips' command system looks like it would be great fun on the table...attempting to juggle the desire to move some units in flanking, while trying to maintain group orders for the bulk of the army for ease of command.
|
|
|
Post by PitYak Studios on Dec 13, 2006 11:09:38 GMT 12
HaT's website has a mass of colour pics hidden throughout that are good refs, also I've got a load myself on the shelf, I'll see what I can find for you.
Was I right or near about the element / basing thing for dbm?
The rules I'm using are, I think, the old Wargames Research Group rules. Basically just picked them because they were free and differentiated between the different troop types I was planning on having.
|
|
|
Post by c0d3monk33 on Dec 13, 2006 12:35:20 GMT 12
I found HaT's colour listings which will help a lot thanks: www.hat.com/ColorsAnc.htmlI'll grub around their web site a bit more tonight and try to figure some pictures too. Yes DBA, DBM uses elements where 2-6 figures are placed on a single base and DBA just uses the basic element types, whereas DBM adds 'training' so you've got Veteran etc. elements.
|
|
|
Post by PitYak Studios on Dec 13, 2006 12:41:26 GMT 12
did you see the pics of painted figs on that site. There are some excellent jobs; the figures, as I said above, are genrally pretty ropey, but some of those painters manage to make them look excellent.
What sizes bases for DBA? most of mine are on something about 2" square if i remember right
|
|
|
Post by PitYak Studios on Dec 13, 2006 12:51:32 GMT 12
This is whetting my appetite for ancients again! I like armies that are colourful, have lots of standards, and tactics that involve charging forward in a straightline. not much difference between these and acw, really.
|
|